Land Suitability

Ensemble MCDM and machine learning approaches for agricultural land assessment

This project integrates advanced multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques with machine learning to assess land suitability for wheat cultivation, providing actionable insights for sustainable agricultural planning and food security.


Overview

Land suitability assessment is critical for modern agriculture, involving the evaluation of soil properties, climate, topography, hydrology, and socio-economic factors. This study provides a comprehensive framework for determining optimal land use for wheat cultivation. By combining multiple MCDM approaches with Random Forest machine learning, we offer a robust methodology for agricultural decision-making that balances productivity and environmental sustainability.


Research Objectives

This study aims to:

  1. Determine land suitability for wheat cultivation in western Iran by integrating MCDM and machine learning methods
  2. Compare advanced MCDM techniques including TOPSIS, GRA, and SAW for land evaluation
  3. Identify the most important factors influencing wheat cultivation suitability in the study area
  4. Develop spatial prediction models using Random Forest and digital soil mapping techniques


Methodology

Study Area

The Gavshan region (5,341 hectares) in western Iran.


Data Collection

Soil Sampling and Analysis:

  • 70 soil profiles selected using stratified random sampling based on geomorphology
  • Analysis of 10 soil properties and wheat yield measurements
  • Laboratory analysis: organic carbon (OC), pH, electrical conductivity (EC), cation exchange capacity (CEC), calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE), particle size distribution, available phosphorus and potassium

Field Data Collection:

  • Wheat yield sampling from 1 m² plots at each profile location
  • Harvest date: August 23, 2019
  • Uniform management practices across the study area


Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods

Three advanced MCDM techniques were employed:

1. TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution):

2. GRA (Gray Relational Analysis):

3. SAW (Simple Additive Weighting):

Attribute Weighting:

  • Shannon’s entropy method used to determine objective weights
  • Reduces subjective influence of decision-makers
  • Accounts for information content and uncertainty in data


Machine Learning Modeling

Random Forest (RF) Algorithm:

  • Ensemble learning for spatial prediction of land suitability values
  • Environmental covariates from multiple sources:
    • Terrain features from 10 m digital elevation model (slope, LS factor, topographic wetness, aspect, curvature)
    • Landsat 8 OLI spectral bands and vegetation indices (30 m resolution)
    • Geomorphological map (categorical data)


Comprehensive methodological framework showing the integration of field sampling, soil analysis, MCDM techniques, and machine learning modeling for land suitability assessment.


Key Findings

Critical Factors for Wheat Cultivation

Shannon’s entropy weighting revealed the most important attributes:

  1. Slope (0.439 weight): Strongest influence on wheat suitability

  2. Organic Carbon (OC) (0.135 weight): Key soil fertility indicator

  3. Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) (0.108 weight): Critical for nutrient dynamics

Other factors (in order of importance):

  • Calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE): 0.090
  • Electrical conductivity (EC): 0.086
  • Gravel content: 0.077
  • Soil thickness: 0.054
  • Soil texture: 0.010


Key Observations:

  • TOPSIS and GRA methods showed stronger correlation with wheat yield than SAW
  • TOPSIS efficiently determined land suitability across most study areas
  • SAW method, while simple, did not capture differences in land suitability as effectively


Random Forest Spatial Modeling

RF algorithm successfully mapped land suitability with high accuracy:

Method RMSE MAE
SAW 0.061 0.003 0.88
GRA 0.072 0.005 0.83
TOPSIS 0.081 0.017 0.80


Spatial Distribution of Suitability

Good Suitability Areas (central region):

  • Characteristics: Slope < 5%, yield > 1.4 t/ha, CEC > 15 cmol+/kg, OC > 1%
  • Coverage: 33% (TOPSIS), 20% (GRA), 6% (SAW)
  • Geomorphological units: Pi111, Pi211, Pl111

Moderate Suitability Areas (central, southern, eastern regions):

  • Characteristics: Slope 5-10%, yield 1-1.4 t/ha, CEC 10-15 cmol+/kg, OC 0.5-1%
  • Coverage: 16% (TOPSIS), 22% (GRA), 29% (SAW)
  • Geomorphological units: Pi121, Pi212, Pl211

Poor Suitability Areas:

  • High slope areas (>10%)
  • Low OC and CEC values
  • Predominantly in hilly and mountainous terrain


Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis

Analysis confirmed the importance of key factors:

Slope: Strong negative spatial autocorrelation with wheat yield in high-slope areas (Hi111, Hi121, Hi131, Hi211, Mo111, Mo121)

OC and CEC: Positive spatial autocorrelation with yield in areas with high organic carbon and cation exchange capacity

MCDM Methods: Positive spatial autocorrelation with yields across the study area, with TOPSIS showing the strongest correlation


Practical Applications

Agricultural Planning Sustainable Land Management

Policy and Decision Support


(Nabiollahi et al., 2024)

References

2024

  1. Rem. Sens.
    remote-sensing.jpg
    Assessment of Land Suitability Potential Using Ensemble Approaches of Advanced Multi-Criteria Decision Models and Machine Learning for Wheat Cultivation
    K. Nabiollahi, N. M. Kebonye, F. Molani, and 4 more authors
    Remote Sensing, 2024